

On 28 February 2026, conflict between the US, Israel, and Iran broke into the open, and within days UK energy prices had already moved. QatarEnergy declared force majeure on its LNG contracts after Iranian strikes hit export facilities. Tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, the chokepoint that roughly 20% of the world’s oil and gas normally passes through, effectively collapsed. Brent crude blew past $100 a barrel for the first time in four years, peaking at $126.
By August, wholesale electricity had eased back to around £55 to £60 per megawatt hour, a genuine calming from the panic of March. But calm isn’t the same as safe. The underlying market is still sitting exposed to the next shock, wherever it comes from, and UK businesses have already lived through enough of these spikes in 2026 to know that a 10% to 30% jump in electricity costs isn’t a once-in-a-decade event anymore. It’s becoming a recurring feature of how energy pricing works. This article looks at exactly what’s been driving these spikes, why no UK business can simply wait them out, and what a genuine long-term strategy actually looks like.
Here’s the bit that trips people up: the UK doesn’t purchase gas directly from Iran. It doesn’t matter. Energy trades on global markets, and when supply gets disrupted anywhere with real weight — the Strait of Hormuz being about as weighty as it gets — prices move everywhere at once. That’s exactly what happened within days of the February conflict breaking out, and it’s the same mechanism that pushed prices up during the Russia-Ukraine crisis back in 2022.
The Bank of England revised its inflation forecast on 19 March 2026, pushing expected CPI to between 3% and 3.5% through Q2 and Q3, largely because of the conflict’s effect on energy costs. Rate cuts that had been expected for spring got pushed back. The Office for Budget Responsibility flagged substantial economic impacts flowing specifically through energy channels. For businesses, that meant rising fuel and fleet costs almost immediately, elevated energy bills from summer onward, suppliers passing on higher input costs across the board, and customers pulling back on spending as their own household costs climbed. Manufacturing input costs hit their highest rate since 1992 within weeks of the strikes.
Businesses that acted early in 2022, locking in rates soon after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, paid significantly less than those who waited to see what would happen. The same pattern played out again in early 2026. Whatever the next geopolitical flashpoint turns out to be, the lesson repeating itself is the same one: energy markets react to global conflict fast, and businesses that wait for certainty before acting are, by definition, acting too late.
A 10% to 30% spike doesn’t usually land as one clean, predictable increase. It moves in waves — wholesale electricity trading around £99 to £102 per megawatt hour during the worst of the March pressure, day-ahead gas swinging between 85p and 115p per therm, before gradually easing as the immediate shock passed and supply routes stabilised. The range itself, 10% at the low end and 30% at the high end, reflects how differently individual businesses experience the same global event, depending on exactly when their contract happened to be priced or renewed.
This is the uncomfortable truth about spike events: two businesses with identical usage can end up paying wildly different amounts, purely based on whether their fixed contract happened to be signed before or after the shock hit. A business that renewed in January 2026, just before the conflict began, locked in materially better pricing than one renewing in March, right into the worst of the volatility.
For many UK enterprises in 2026, energy overheads now account for up to 20% of total operating costs, and yet a large share of businesses still don’t have a formal strategy for managing that exposure. When a cost line that size is left to float freely against global geopolitical risk, a 10% to 30% swing isn’t a rounding error — it’s a genuine threat to margin.
The UK energy landscape has shifted in ways that go beyond any single conflict. Wind power now accounts for around 44.6% of UK generation, a genuinely positive shift for the long-term cost and security of the grid, but one that introduces its own intermittency and price swings in the meantime. Non-commodity costs, including Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) charges, have risen by double-digit percentages in several regions in recent years, and similar increases are expected to continue. None of this points toward a return to the calmer, more predictable pricing environment businesses may remember from before 2021.
Whilst domestic households benefit from Ofgem’s price cap, UK businesses remain fully exposed to a volatile wholesale market with no equivalent protection. That’s not a temporary gap waiting to be closed — it’s simply how the business energy market is structured, and it means the responsibility for managing volatility sits with the business itself, not with a regulator.
Every time a genuine shock has hit UK energy markets in recent years, from 2021’s initial gas crisis through to 2022’s invasion of Ukraine and now 2026’s Middle East conflict, the businesses that fixed early consistently outperformed those that waited for clarity. Clarity, in a geopolitical crisis, tends to arrive only after prices have already moved.
Businesses have increasingly moved away from simple, single fixed-price deals toward more structured approaches that allow for staged purchasing over time, rather than betting everything on the timing of one renewal date. This doesn’t need to mean complex financial instruments for a typical SME — it starts with simply not leaving your renewal to chance, and reviewing your contract position well ahead of expiry, rather than at the deadline.
Procurement decisions made 18 to 24 months ahead of contract expiry typically secure meaningfully better pricing than last-minute renewals, largely because businesses acting early aren’t forced to buy into whatever the market happens to be doing at the exact moment their old contract runs out. For most SMEs, this simply means starting the comparison process months before your renewal date, not weeks.
Larger, energy-intensive businesses consuming significant volumes increasingly use structured approaches like fixing a majority of their baseload demand while retaining some flexibility for favourable market movements. For most SMEs, the practical equivalent is simpler: a fixed-rate contract of sufficient length to provide genuine budget certainty, reviewed regularly rather than left untouched until it lapses into an out-of-contract rate.
In a genuinely elevated and volatile price environment, the businesses managing risk well tend to prioritise protecting their margin over squeezing out the last fraction of a penny per kWh. A slightly higher but reliably fixed rate, secured with good timing, consistently beats a marginally cheaper deal that leaves a business exposed to the next spike.
The rollout of Market-Wide Half-Hourly Settlement is set to fundamentally reshape how business energy costs are calculated, enabling far more precise time-of-use pricing from December 2026 onward. For businesses with flexible consumption patterns, that creates a genuine opportunity to manage costs more actively. For everyone else, it adds a layer of complexity worth understanding now, rather than scrambling to catch up once it’s already in effect.
For businesses with suitable premises, integrating on-site generation such as solar PV provides something a fixed contract alone cannot: a genuine physical hedge against market price spikes, since a portion of your energy use becomes entirely independent of wholesale pricing swings. This isn’t the right fit for every business, but for those with high daytime consumption and long-term premises, it’s increasingly part of a genuinely resilient strategy.
If your business energy contract renews within the next six months, this is the point to start comparing, not the week before it expires. Given how quickly geopolitical events have moved prices twice already in recent years, the gap between acting early and acting late has real financial weight behind it.
The goal of a long-term strategy isn’t to predict the next conflict — nobody can do that reliably. It’s to make sure your business isn’t fully exposed when the next one happens, whatever form it takes. That means building in review points, not just responding after a spike has already landed on your invoice.
Given how differently gas and electricity have moved through 2026’s volatility, comparing business gas and electricity independently, rather than accepting a single bundled deal, generally gives a clearer, more accurate picture of where genuine savings sit.
A long-term strategy means checking your position periodically, not only when a contract is about to lapse. Markets move between renewal dates too, and a business that only checks in once every one to three years is, by definition, missing the windows in between.
At Beta Energy Direct, based in Manchester and working with SMEs and corporates across the UK, we know that reacting to each individual shock as it happens isn’t a strategy — it’s just damage control. Our job is to help your business get ahead of that cycle, with contract timing and comparison built around the realities of a genuinely volatile market, not around hoping the next crisis doesn’t happen.
Our approach gives you:
If your renewal is approaching, or you simply haven’t reviewed your energy strategy since the last shock hit, get a free business energy quote and let’s build a plan that doesn’t depend on the world staying calm.
Businesses building genuine resilience into their cost base often find the same review is worth extending to their wider utilities. Many SMEs working with us on energy also review their business water supply, broadband and telecom arrangements, and business finance options at the same time, since the same principle applies across the board: waiting for stability before reviewing a major cost is rarely a winning approach.
Energy trades on global markets, so disruption to major supply routes, like the Strait of Hormuz during the 2026 Iran conflict, pushes prices up worldwide, regardless of whether the UK buys energy directly from the country or region involved.
Recent geopolitical events have driven business electricity cost increases in the range of 10% to 30%, though the exact figure varies significantly depending on when a business’s contract happens to be priced relative to the event.
Structural factors, including the UK’s growing reliance on wind generation, rising network charges, and ongoing exposure to global LNG markets, suggest continued volatility is likely, rather than a return to the calmer pricing environment seen before 2021.
Reviewing your contract position well ahead of your renewal date, rather than waiting until it lapses, is consistently the most effective step. Procurement decisions made 18 to 24 months ahead of expiry typically secure meaningfully better pricing than last-minute renewals.
A fixed-rate contract protects you for its duration, but the price you lock in still depends on market conditions at the time you sign. That’s why timing your renewal well, rather than waiting for a crisis to force your hand, matters as much as the decision to fix in the first place.
Ofgem (ofgem.gov.uk) and the National Energy System Operator (neso.energy) publish regular market and network updates. For guidance specific to your business, request a free quote from Beta Energy Direct.
The 2026 Iran conflict is only the latest reminder that UK businesses cannot simply wait out geopolitical risk in the energy market. The businesses that come through each shock in better shape aren’t the ones that guessed correctly — they’re the ones that built a genuine long-term strategy before the next crisis arrived.
Call Beta Energy Direct on (0800) 999-1160 or request your free energy comparison today, and put a real strategy behind your business energy costs, not just a renewal date on a calendar.
